Medal of Honor™

The campaign is too short. I doubt anybody is playing multiplayer atp. I can't recommend buying this game unless you pay $10 or less.

The game is good so if you can get it for cheap, then get it.

Good
- Good campaign.
- Varied missions.
- Good story.

Bad
- Too short.
- Guns have no recoil.

very fun game to play

3525

Its not bad - took me about 4.5hrs on the single player so only worth getting if heavily discounted.
That said it was a fun game but is *very* heavy on US jingoism!

GOOD GAME

The variety of the battlefield events are brilliant and very real

No multiplayer. be warned

Great.

5/10

It's meh. The shooting mechanics are okay, but it feels like you have to mag dump just to kill one bad guy unless you always go for head shots. Most engagements are within a stones throw and unrealistic.

The story and missions are very linear and uninspiring. You basically just go from point A to point B in straight line while dropping bodies along the way. There's no sense of the gravity of the situations you're put in because in this game you're always saved from it one way or another. The good guys always win.

The cutscenes are okay, but mostly unrealistic. You have Apache attack helicopters engaging bad guys at very close range basically hovering 20 meters above dudes with RPGs. Your main character is sneaking around enemies within arms reach but they don't see or hear him.

Overall, this game is pretty bland unlike the MOH games of old.

Game is Ass, completely ass. I was looking for something similar to the old MOH games, a good campaign, not an uninspired, low effort Ad to join the army.

Bought on a discount and still feel scammed.
Played on the hardest mode and still feel there was no challenge. Actually there was a challege, and it was to deal with the NPCs that were on your team, the stupid high sensitivity and the poor mechanics.

In fact I lost way too much time trying to lower the ultra high sensitivity and trying to play at 1080p without the letters on the menu looking horribly pixelated.
Surprise, you have to modify the game input files for that (set MouseSensitivity around 4, it's on 35 by default), because I guess the game was supposed to be played on console.
I also wasted a lot of times on bugs on certain missions. for example on the one you have to plant bombs on the trucks, I didn't know what I was supposed to do, I would kill everything and nothing would happen, no interaction with the trucks, I restarted the mission several times and nothing happened.
Then on one restart the stupid NPC did what he was supposed to do, plant the bomb on the first truck and let the mission advance.

This was so bad, I tried to refund at some point but I was barely past 2 hours after fighting with the config and give the game a chance thinking it would get better at some point.

This game doesn't deserve the reviews it has at all. Maybe those are from years ago when you could play online, maybe that was the fun part of the game, because the campaing I paid for was lame.

Avoid this one if you are looking for some Nostalgia, better go back to MOHAA or the other old games.
Those had better story, better mechanics, and there wasn't an ass talking all the time on the radio telling you what you need to do and when because the game doesn't give you a chance to deviate a little from the intended path.

Such good memories, one of the first fps games i ever played as a kid on ps3.

Love

Thanks for destroying gaming pleasure

I am slightly baffled why this Medal of Honor was brought to steam and not the others, especially since Warfighter is just a sequel to this. Either way, the COD4-ification of the industry was in full swing at the time, and while that game was ok, its effects were devastating, spawning a wave of borderline clones like this, or at least the copied gameplay of sprint, ads and regen health. This title is just extremely bland and stiff, compared to the actual CoD titles.

The game's marketing campaign was interesting, they were REALLY insistent on how crucial the interviews with the war veterans were for this game, but from the start it was obvious the game would not be a realistic tactical game, but yet another WW2 franchise making a switch to modern combat, after the CoD4 success, the cutscenes are omnipresent, the setpieces try to be as bombastic as they can be, considering the setting of stone huts and caves, in sandy/snowy mountains, you will see all your familiar camera movements, cliches like falling on your ass every second scripted cutscene, getting hit by a buttstock from behind a corner etc., but it's all so much more amateurish than I'd expect, from stiff movement, to lethargic first person animations, to disappearing enemies after script triggers, to softlock bugs (my favorite was a heli camera being stuck slightly to the left, so I couldn't mark one of the 3 mortar positions), to unintuitive level layouts, to allies teleporting through solid objects, to objective markers disappearing, to jittery camera movement when you move it to much in the wrong direction during scripted sniping sections. It's all so f***ng weird, like a multimillion dollar production somehow meshing with bargain bin code, I have no clue what happened, especially since the campaign was coded on familiar UE and not Frostbite, like its sequel. I have absolutely no idea how this title was as successful compared to its sequel, besides the aforementioned market infatuation with "Modern Warfare". What kept me going was just how funny mowing down Skaven waves of arabs was, in contrast to your good guys being politely captured instead of executed on the spot, or them emotionally screaming for help when 1 (one) person from the group was heavily injured, it is unapologetic warporn at its finest, and I'm glad I can enjoy both this and Spec Ops the Line, to the agonizing cries of virtue signaling english majors and youtube essayist, sorry not sorry mayo monkeys.

So that covers the gameplay and story, and visuals are definitely more proud of themselves than I am of them, despite how on rails it is, it did not blow me away, it had nice lighting at times, but the models and textures were so uneven that the resolution/poly gap would be gargantuan at times, I think it was obviously designed for lower rendering resolutions, where higher fidelity models would constantly flash in front of your 60 fov eyes, so they had to make sure those human and gun models would stand out. Besides the lighting it is mostly unimpressive, I am numb to the vfx overload during the explosion sequences, so I was mostly fishing for views of vistas, and those were often more foggy than I could appreciate fully.

Sound was ok, very loud to make sure it's action packed, the VAs were suspicious, as some were doing the usual military overacting, while others were doing the more down to earth monotone military act, and some were just straight up bad, the music was there, mostly unnoticable besides the obviously manipulative string tracks near the end, a requirement for the mandatory "hopeless holdout" before "final push" moments of the narrative.

All in all, it is a bit too boring to be consistently hilarious, and too janky to be a 100% cod clone, so at a deep discount you might as well get it to depopulate some mountain villages, but I probably wouldn't go out of my way to recommend it, probably better to buy the Allied Assault games from GOG.

good game

Solid 1st person shooter. Fun scenarios. As good as COD.

Fun to play for old gamers who enjoy an old-fashioned but highly enjoyable shooter

The campaign is fun, get it on sale if you want it;.

Very action bop

This is just Battlefield 2.5 but good

This game brings back so many memories, has the best campaign in a FPS of this type. No super soldiers or super villains, just soldiers and more grounded, which is so refreshing, especially in these more modern times. Great pacing and great gunplay that holds up 15 years on!

Nothing to dislike about this game. Quiet start then all hell breaks loose. Good game .. even by todays standards .. its well worth the few quid.

Good fps

this is game is what game is when I was a child. I get to the point that I finish this 2x a day and every mission is already calibrated in childs brain. but yeah it was good for me, this and MW3. I wish this game get to see the light on GOG. Steam version is not good when it comes to old games, they always and meant to crash. modern games, yeah for sure they work, but old ones like this, nah.

Medal of Honor is a fairly solid and barebone shooter but compared to golden-age CoD games, it tremendously pales in comparison. The story and setting takes itself quite seriously and is loosely based on actual events but there aren't really anything remarkable or memorable about it. All the main characters are generic army dudes, who fight against equally generic Taliban and Chechen soldiers. There aren't any Captain Price or super bad guys like Zekhaev or Makarov. A couple of interesting level designs here and there but they are held back by how incredibly linear the game is. The main protagonists that you play as can't even open doors or climb ledges on their own, you have to wait for the NPCs to do it for you. They might as well remove your WASD keys and move you from scene to scene like House of the Dead. Although with all that being said, I still had fun with the 4-hour-long campaign and would still recommend getting it on sale. For a game made in Unreal Engine 3, graphic still holds up really well. Gunplay is surprisingly good, the weapon sound is crisp and weighty. Headshot is very satisfying to land. There isn't a huge variety of weapons but most are viable and solid. Game is really easy tho. Even on the hardest difficulty, I barely broke a sweat.

Can we have Medal of Honor: Warfighter on Steam? please? PLEASE!? Like seriously.... Please! -.- >_> x_x

Love this game so much. For whatever reason, I enjoy this game more than COD xD

Metal of Honor 2010 Reboot: 9/10

This game was full of action and always kept me on my toes. 9/10 would reccomend. Only problem I have had was figuring out what I was supposed to do on some of the missions, but other than that, amazing game.

Crashes 3 hours in.

Really cool game . very good Campaign it's fun and also enjoyable ,so sad that there's no more medal of honor. ;(

This was an effort to reboot the series by Electronic Arts and try to compete with Activision's CoD series. It worked and sold 3.5 million copies in a fortnight; the follow-up title Warfighter was a commercial zombie though, prompting an EA earnings call in mid 2013. And that is pretty much all we've seen of the series in 13 years, bar a lone VR release in 2020.

And it is a shame because this is a very good FPS. The Campaign all revolves around a single mission over two days that goes wrong and leaves a SEAL team in need of rescue. You play various roles in the story, from one of the SEALS to a sniper, a spotter, a helicopter gunship pilot and other roles. Largely it is cover and move with standard infantry weapons, pistol, assault rifle, sniper rifle all with a variety of scopes. There are no perks, levels or upgrades; the game plumbs more for somewhere between realism and action and the graphics still look decent in a Battlefield: Bad Company way. You have to forgive some of the interpretations though, as you can get hit multiple times with RPGs or gunships and you don't die. From a fun game play standpoint that's a good thing. Too much realism will kill you every time.

Enemy AI is varied, they are hopelessly prone to being flanked and the game usually funnels you to a semi-open area where you can do this to pass through enemy camps. If you do not take cover in these situations and attack head on, you can get picked off pretty quickly out in the open. And yet at other times someone can stand right behind you and shoot you repeatedly with little damage and there are occasionally some glitches with people getting stuck falling through as pole.

The game largely runs on rails and pushes you from one designated area to another for a cut scenes. It is engaging and the graphics are good enough to make you feel immersed, that story plays out in a fairly meaningless manner until near the end which it delivers well.

You will need to switch between night vision and regular at various points throughout the game, but usually your buddies will direct you with audio, if you pay attention. They also warn of the direction of threat, grenades and where to push up two. If you do pay attention then these NPC buddies works well with you and you do feel part of a well oiled combat team.

The trouble is that Medal of Honor felt their route back to success was to emulate Call of Duty and they take the likeness too far. It is almost indistinguishable from CoD and EA found themselves unable to maintain the quality and annual iterations of that series. The main campaign here is short at 4-5 hours and whilst it is clearly intended as an advert for multiplayer, that died in 2023. Leaving it simply too short to justify anything like a full price purchase. If you can get it for the regular sale price of $3 to $4 then you'll enjoy yourself.

game doesnt load how do i fix problem

Biggest plot twist ever after BF3 fr fr.Recommend 100%

Aged terribly.

A solis FPS with a good storyline.

Honestly this has been a good game,loved the campaign ,great story loved the mechanics except for the constant dying from rpg's but that's just me.

After Call of Duty moved to modern times, it was the first game set in modern times by Medal of Honor. The subject they chose was good, it was about the operations of American Navy Seal commandos in Afghanistan and they wrote a good story. They were probably inspired by the true story in the Lone Survivor movie. Later, they finished the story very well with the sequel Moh Warfighter and it was a very good game.

Guess I downloaded wrong Modern Warfare.

2/10

2025 and is still more realistic and fun than the campaigns of the new COD or any other triple AAA games today.

I'd rather my operators be real SEALs and Delta Force than fortnite streamers and snoop dogg. Makes the campaign even more fun and realistic that I'm fighting AQ and Talibums.

One of the worst games in history. Trash, repetitive mechanics, toxic male warmonger ideology everywhere, yet another "US warcrimes simulator" from a company that has made some of the worst of them.

I completed the single player twice(cause I got a new laptop and wanted to complete it again on the highest settings). It's a decent single player experience but it's very short(6 hours). I enjoyed the missions and the story, they were more "realistic" compared to COD MW/BOPs series but it didn't make the game any better. The NPCs were kinda stoopid but the shooting was pretty fun. If you have 5-10$ then the single player might be worth trying out, I got it for about 3$ because of regional pricing and it wasn't a bad game for it's price. As far as I know the multiplayer is dead. Also it has peek mechanics if I remember correctly, I like games that allow you to peek.

I ran it on Linux and it worked fine with the Proton-GE layer. Overall a 6.5/10 for me, it's not an innovative game but it's a good grab during sales.

it's a classic old FPS game, but there is no more Medal of Honor after 2012, EA killed the series

aaa shooter of the era

A more grounded in real life shooter than the likes of COD. It's a shame this series died as it was a good change of pace from the craziness of Battlefield and COD. Remaster MOH: Frontline please!

Medal of Honor does a lot of things well and a few things not so well.

I first played this game in 2010 when it was first released. Back then, I remember having a fondness for the game. There were a great deal of "cool moments" and the narrative running throughout was simple but compelling. This fondness still holds up even 15 years later. There is a great deal of authenticity I have found in the game still to date.

However, comparing this game to other FPS experiences, it's lacking by today's standards. Move to cover, shoot. Move to cover, shoot some more. Get a bigger gun, blast the fortified structure. Wash, rinse, repeat.
Sometimes you get to put on night optics. Sometimes you get to shoot a sniper rifle. I wasn't able to manage more than 4 hours from the campaign front to back.

In short, it was nice to revisit old memories, but the experience was purely nostalgic, and may not be as fulfilling to someone looking to pick it up with fresh eyes.

Since I can't play multiplayer because there are no servers and I can't recover the password, for me this game is garbage!

📜 Overview
Medal of Honor is a first-person shooter game developed by Electronic Arts, originally released in 1999. Set during World War II, it broke new ground by offering an immersive experience that focused on the soldier's perspective. The game casts players in the role of Lieutenant Jimmy Patterson, a member of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), tasked with critical missions behind enemy lines. Medal of Honor stood out for its realism and compelling gameplay, drawing comparisons to the popular Saving Private Ryan film.

🌟 Pros
✅ Immersive World War II Experience – The game offers a gripping portrayal of World War II, with highly detailed environments and historically accurate settings.
✅ Innovative Gameplay – It combined action-packed shooting mechanics with stealth and tactical elements, allowing players to choose how to approach objectives.
✅ Strong Narrative – The game presents a well-written story, with characters that players can invest in, making the missions more engaging.
✅ Varied Missions – A mix of objective-based and combat-heavy missions keeps the gameplay diverse and fresh throughout the experience.
✅ Sound and Voice Acting – The atmospheric sound design and strong voice acting contribute to the game's overall immersive quality.

⚠️ Cons
❌ AI Limitations – Enemy AI can sometimes be predictable and lack complexity, making combat less challenging at times.
❌ Limited Multiplayer – While the game introduced some multiplayer modes, it was a feature that didn’t reach the same level of depth or popularity as later titles in the genre.
❌ Outdated Graphics – While the game was impressive for its time, the visuals may appear dated by today’s standards, and certain textures can feel blurry.
❌ Repetitive Gameplay – Some missions and gameplay loops can feel repetitive, especially in terms of shooting and combat.

💬 Player Sentiment

Positive: Many players enjoy the nostalgic World War II setting, gripping narrative, and memorable gameplay mechanics. The game’s authenticity and immersive atmosphere are frequently praised.
Negative: The lack of challenging AI and sometimes slow pacing were cited as drawbacks for some players.
🏆 Rating Breakdown
🎮 Story & Narrative: 9/10
🔫 Gameplay: 8/10
🎨 Graphics & Design: 7/10
🎧 Sound & Voice Acting: 9/10
🕹️ Replayability: 7/10

🎯 Final Verdict
Medal of Honor remains a landmark title in the history of first-person shooters. Its realistic portrayal of World War II, solid gameplay mechanics, and immersive atmosphere make it an unforgettable experience for fans of the genre. Although it shows its age in some areas, it still holds up as a strong and influential game in the FPS landscape. Whether you’re a long-time fan of the franchise or a newcomer interested in WWII shooters, Medal of Honor is worth playing.

I have never played this game before. It took me back to those days when game-play wasn`t over-complicated. Good story, good fps.

Finished the campaign on hard in 5.1 hours...pretty short. Felt way too easy for a good portion of the campaign - bad guys are very slow to target you and it wasn't until the last hour or so that it felt decently challenging due to the sheer number of bad guys. Enjoyed the story and dialog, but felt like this was a budget version of COD4 with worse bots, too easy, and too short. Radio chatter between team and other story elements felt fairly authentic (not that I would know) which was a pleasant improvement compared to other games including COD. Had a few buggy spots where it wouldn't trigger the next cut scene or action until I found the magic spot to stand in. Overall I'd give this a 6/10 - worth playing if it's on sale.

Campaign was great, but far far too short. Multiplayer.... well all medal of honour servers shut down in 2023. So that's that. This game isn't worth more than £10 in my opinion today.

best campaign i played for last 2 years it was smooth,fast,it had story i rlly liked.For 4 bucks its a good deal