Разработчик: Schwarz Games
Описание
GYM SIMULATOR
18+
Чрезвычайно реалистичная RPG от первого лица.
Особенности:
Игровой процесс:
-РОСТ МЫШЦ В РЕАЛЬНОМ ВРЕМЕНИ. Наблюдайте, как ваше тело трансформируется во время тренировки
-Говорите с горячими девушками и попытайтесь затащить их в постель
-Упражнения с тренажёрами и гантелями
-Пресс
-Отжимания
-Штанга
-Беговая дорожка
-Бейте боксерскую грушу
-Участвуйте в соревнованиях
-Бейте ипала
-Покупайте протеин
-Диалоги
-Душевая
-Мужская раздевалка
-NPC относятся к вам по-разному, от того как вы начакасын
- Отличнаяreat стилизованная графика
-Оригинальная идея и нестандартный геймплей
-Шокирующие моменты
Это превосходный проект, который начинается с раннего доступа, обладающий внушительной базой геймплейных возможностей.
Поддерживаемые языки: russian, english, simplified chinese
Системные требования
Windows
- ОС: Windows 10
- Процессор: i7
- Оперативная память: 4 GB ОЗУ
- Видеокарта: GTX 780
- DirectX: версии 11
- Место на диске: 1500 MB
- ОС: Windows 10
- Процессор: Mid-to-High END
- Оперативная память: 8 GB ОЗУ
- Видеокарта: Mid-to-High END
- DirectX: версии 11
- Место на диске: 1500 MB
Отзывы пользователей
Gym Simulator is a fairly basic Russian Unreal asset flipped tech demo/shovelware scam, one of many hundreds, if not thousands of these glutting Steam. The "developer" paid for/pirated a few Unreal Marketplace gym assets, arranged them haphazardly in a first person adventure game template with some basic interactions, and submitted it to Valve as if they're real game developers.
Two notable criteria for what makes an asset flip instead of legitimate use of stock assets are whether those assets comprise the majority of the game, and whether the "developer" properly credited the people who created most of the assets in the game. This game fails both of those tests. The "developers" here didn't credit any of the artists and real, actual game developers who created the assets here, so this is plagiarism, as well as cash grab shovelware.
The game was abandoned roughly 6 months after launch and hasn't been updated in 5 years. It blew past the developers commitment to complete the game without any notification or admission of failure from the developer. The game will never be completed.
The game is very simplistic, small and limited in scope and ambition. This feels more like a tech demo, proof of concept or student homework assignment rather than a fully fledged product designed for PC gamers. As such it doesn't offer any real value as a serious PC game.
Taking this shovelware seriously as if it was a genuine attempt to make a game, it doesn't meet basic minimum requirements that most PC gamers expect as standard.
There's no option to change the resolution and no useful graphics tweaks. There's no way to ensure this is running at the native resolution of your display. There's no guarantee this game will look right on any PC as a result of this hamfisted design decision.
The game assets are fairly mediocre/low quality which fits with the idea they weren't developed by the game creator... they look like they're "just reasonable enough" to go on sale as part of an asset pack. The issue of asset flipping aside, ultimately the quality of these assets is low and low quality always makes for a less than optimal gaming experience.
The game features lazy low-polygon "retro" assets, making this look like a barely functional 3D game from the 1990s. It's unclear why the developers weren't able to arrange high quality, high polygon count contemporary assets for the game, and also irrelevant... what matters is that this looks bad as a result of their decisions, a compromise PC gamers shouldn't have to put up with.
These technical defects push this game below acceptable standards for any modern PC game.
Unethically, the developer sold keys to this abandoned Early Access game into cheap, nasty game bundles, where they knew it would be advertised and sold as a complete PC game. This seems to have been done in an attempt to mislead gamers into buying a knowingly faulty, defective and incomplete product. When a developer does this for a game they have zero practical intention of completing, this is essentially a scam, an intention to get paid for a broken/unfinished product. Often this is done as an exit strategy, as the developer takes the money and runs. No refunds have been given, the developer kept all the money they took from gamers.
Another unethical act of this developer, knowing full well that this game is abandoned and they will never complete it, they are deliberately trying to scam gamers into buying it by offering it on discount and selling keys to the game from third party key resellers. It's impossible to "accidentally" discount a game. The developer looked at their abandoned game, and instead of doing the right thing and removing it from Steam, they instead doubled-down and tried to scam even more people into paying for it. Greedy, and completely unethical. Doing the wrong thing, on purpose, for money. This is not okay.
This kind of asset flipping isn't harmless. It makes it harder for gamers to find genuinely made games from ethical developers. It makes it harder for genuine indie developers, who put hard work into trying to make real games, to find an audience for their products. It gives indie developers a bad name.
So, should you buy this asset flip? Is this better than any of the 100,000+ genuinely made games on Steam? Of course not!
Gym Simulator is relatively cheap at $2 USD, but it's not worth it. Given the defects and quality issues with the game, coupled with the unrealistic price, and the questionable ethical nature of the developer and/or their associates (as outlined above), this is impossible to recommend. This is also competing with over 11,000 free games available on Steam, many of them far better than this paid product.
Ladies and gentlemen
DO NOT BUY THIS GAME!!
This game sucks! The idiot(est) game i've ever tried!!
Игры похожие на Gym Simulator
Дополнительная информация
| Разработчик | Schwarz Games |
| Платформы | Windows |
| Ограничение возраста | Нет |
| Дата релиза | 20.01.2025 |
| Отзывы пользователей | 58% положительных (96) |