Разработчик: NedoStudio
Описание
Особенности:
- Почти каждая вещь, которую предстоит найти для прохождения игры, случайно располагается в одном из нескольких возможных мест. Помимо этого в игре присутствуют и другие возможности не зависимые от игрока, такие как включенные/выключенные и даже сломанные фонари, расположенные вдоль дороги или дождь который может неожиданно пойти в любой момент. Это делает игру непредсказуемой.
- В игре помимо разряда батарейки у фонарика, существует возможность его поломки, для починки придется найти соответствующий инструмент или же до конца игры ходить с альтернативным источником света. У каждого из этих вариантов света есть свои преимущества.
Поддерживаемые языки: english, russian
Системные требования
Windows
- ОС *: Windows 7+
- Процессор: AMD Athlon II x2 2.5GHz
- Оперативная память: 2 GB ОЗУ
- Видеокарта: GeForce GT 630
- DirectX: версии 10
- Место на диске: 500 MB
- ОС *: Windows 7
- Процессор: AMD A8-6600 x4 3.9GHz
- Оперативная память: 4 GB ОЗУ
- Видеокарта: GeForce GTX 750
- DirectX: версии 11
- Место на диске: 1 GB
Mac
- Процессор: AMD Athlon II x2 2.5GHz
- Оперативная память: 2 GB ОЗУ
- Видеокарта: GeForce GT 630
- Место на диске: 500 MB
- Процессор: AMD A8-6600 x4 3.9GHz
- Оперативная память: 4 GB ОЗУ
- Видеокарта: GeForce GTX 750
- Место на диске: 1 GB
Linux
- Процессор: AMD Athlon II x2 2.5GHz
- Оперативная память: 2 GB ОЗУ
- Видеокарта: GeForce GT 630
- Место на диске: 500 MB
- Процессор: AMD A8-6600 x4 3.9GHz
- Оперативная память: 4 GB ОЗУ
- Видеокарта: GeForce GTX 750
- Место на диске: 1 GB
Отзывы пользователей
Heavy RNG (as many comments say), Monster is stupid, idk, good for a first time project but i'm not sure if it has a place on the steam store. Also 5 euros for something so short is not worth it.
Until the last is some pretty lazy Russian shovelware, ostensibly it's a Digital Homicide style asset flip, or what Valve calls a "Fake Game". The "developer" slapped together a few stock 3D models/Unity assets, dumped them all in a blender with a lulzy, very poorly made map and simple gameplay loop to make a first person adventure with the occasional jump scare. Then submitted it to Valve as if they're real game developers. This probably took the best part of a day to put together, it's extremely lazy and low quality, very buggy, and most certainly a shovelware cash grab from Russia.
To emphasize how little effort there is, I can go over the entire game in full detail in just a very short paragraph. It's a small map with two monsters that will give you harmless jumpscares or hurt you (the boy and girl that you can learn about if you read any of the 5 pickup texts). You have a battery powered torch you can use to deter the boy/monster. There's a bomb you must disarm, by collecting either a phone or a set of pliers (both randomly placed), then going to the bomb (around the middle of the map). Then you just go back to the start and end the game. You can finish this game within roughly 2 minutes if you know this basic information. There, saved you from needing to buy or play this garbage.
Taking this shovelware seriously as if it was a genuine attempt to make a game, it doesn't meet basic minimum requirements that most PC gamers expect as standard.
There's no options to change the resolution for the game or customise the graphics settings. There's no way for gamers to ensure this is running at the native resolution of their displays... there's no guarantee this game will look right on any PC as a result of this hamfisted design decision. There's no way for gamers to try improve the low quality graphics.
The game features lazy low-polygon "retro" assets, making this look like a barely functional 3D game from the mid 2000s. It's unclear why the developers weren't able to arrange high quality, high polygon count contemporary assets for the game, and also irrelevant... what matters is that this looks bad as a result of their decisions, a compromise PC gamers shouldn't have to put up with.
The controls can't be customised, which will be an annoyance for many, but it can also render the game unplayable for differently-abled gamers.
These technical defects push this game below acceptable standards for any modern PC game.
The poor quality of this game is reflected by how many people spent time with it. At the time of this review, SteamDB shows the all-time peak player number was only 3 players. This is a remarkably low number, and now, the only player activity occurs once or twice a month, presumably someone loading it up to see what it is then quickly uninstalling it. Considering there's over 120 million gamers on Steam and well over 50,000 games for gamers to choose from (over 9,000 completely free titles), the overwhelming lack of interest in this low quality game is to be expected.
Until the last has the almost comically optimistic (if it wasn't so sad) price of around $4 USD, it's not worth it given the defects and shortcomings with the product, especially considering the sheer number of completely free, much higher quality games on Steam.
Ok well I wish that I could have properly played this but there are bugs to work out and it wasn't very polished. I'm not sure if the notes/dialogue were written in English or poorly translated but I did not know what exactly was happening or why.
The first time I loaded the game I was immediately attacked and killed by a troll. I thought I was defusing a bomb??? The second time I loaded the game I went along the very dark path because my flashlight literally only stays on for three seconds and then no longer works. Then my character will light a lighter, which also stays on for about three seconds and then no longer works.
I found a couple of notes that were...unclear but it seems there was a biological experiment gone awry? What does that have to do with the bomb? After reading the notes, the movement controls are locked so you have to switch to another mode to move and then once you do, they work again. So i take a few steps and then a girl pops up and jump scares you with a stock-scream asset. She had plenty of texture to her face but her entire body was all one color and clearly not finished and I'm not sure what/who she was or why she was there or why she was screaming at me. She didn't kill me, and I don't think she hurt me because the screen didn't turn red. I turned the game off after that because the controls are wonky, the items don't work, and I honestly have no idea what my objective is.
Not a good game. The RNG sucks, items are often hidden far away from the path and you just won't find them. Also the monster walks and kills you to fast and he seems to teleport himself. So you will die a lot of cheap deaths.
The good!
- Uh, it works. Mostly. Sort of.
- It is technically, in some sense of the term, a game.
The bad.
- Enemies are everywhere and all except the main baddie just instantly jumpscare + damage you with no warning. The main baddie, on the other hand, is totally laughable and spends most of his time stuck on terrain or generally ignoring you. Unless he doesn't, in which case he's actually impossible to outrun and survive.
- The game is basically a pseudo-randomized scavanger hunt in the spoopy woods - basically Slender. Unlike Slender, you have to find everything in a specific order ... meaning, statistically speaking, you'll almost always find the wrong thing first and just get frustrated.
- Has actually the single worst jumpscare ever. Seriously I'm easy AF to jumpscare and I laughed at it. That is, however, the most fun I had while playing.
THE VERDICT
If you like bad indie horror games set in creepy forests just go play Slender, it's at least competent.
Video first impressions: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/186745822
This game is not for me. I picked this up for 45% off during the Halloween sale and I feel a bit ripped off.
I can see what some people would find fun with this game. It's neat to run around in the woods looking for randomly spawned items to save the day while avoiding a big scary monster.
The RNG factor was incredibly unkind to me during my playthrough. The monster consistently spawned on top of me and running is ridiculously terrible in this game. You run out of stamina after only a few seconds of trying to get away. I couldn't figure out how to outrun the monster so I died a lot which was frustrating. I had a really hard time finding anything that wasn't batteries which eventually led to me getting the ending where the bomb goes off. Pity.
If you have favorable RNG then you are able to finish the game in less than 10 minutes. Yikes.
So yeah, not for me.
The graphics are okay and the atmosphere is really nicely done. however, it seems completely random whether you win or lose. things happen randomly and dont make much sense. sometimes things will spawn right next to you and kill you and other times you just get jumpscared.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_tO4r_VwgY&feature=youtu.be
I bought this game after watching the intro video. After winning Until the Last, here are my thoughts.
This is a very, very short game. I died twice and won it the third time. Those 3 attempts took me 24 minutes. If you read the help before playing the game you could easily win it the first try. That means the game could take a tiny 7 minutes to win.
Yes there is the replayability factor. The items appear randomly and you could go through the motions of doing everything again and again.
So the time it took to win the game was obviously a big negative. It felt like one level of a much bigger game. I was actually dissapointed when after winning the first level there was nothing more.
The actual gameplay elements were fun. Running around, trying to escape the monster, looking for the items (this could become frustrating if they spawn in difficult places), and defusing the bomb were all generally fun.
To summarize, this is a fun little Indie game, but it's just way, way too short. 7 Minutes?! Thats just crazy. For that fact I can't recommend this game. If it had 9 or 10 more levels, then I would have recommended it.
Дополнительная информация
| Разработчик | NedoStudio |
| Платформы | Windows |
| Ограничение возраста | Нет |
| Дата релиза | 27.01.2025 |
| Отзывы пользователей | 0% положительных (8) |