Разработчик: Ladia Group
Описание
Construct entire residential districts for people and improve their well-being by building markets, schools, theaters and other places, and connect them with roads for ease of access.
Create warehouses and farms, plant wheat and bake bread, mine clay and manufacture all kinds of crockery. Once you have your manufacturing in place and running, provide your population with food, improving the status of households.
Sell the excess of products and make more money. The richer households become with time, the more taxes they pay, thus helping you improve the city. Once you have successfully completed all the missions, you will be able to build your own villa!
- 30 levels
- Build your own villa!
- Large maps for construction
Поддерживаемые языки: english
Системные требования
Windows
- OS: WinXP / Win7 / Win8 / Win10
- Processor: 2.0GHz
- Memory: 1 GB RAM
- DirectX: Version 7.0
- Storage: 145 MB available space
Mac
- OS: 10.8/10.7/10.6/10.5
- Processor: 2.0 GHz
- Memory: 161 MB RAM
- Storage: 1 GB available space
Отзывы пользователей
This is a progression game. You work your way through several scenerios. Its fairly easy to begin but gets harder as you progress.
Nice simplistic builder game that looks nice and pleasant. Play the sandbox, only do the first 5 or so missions so you get the basics, but then play the sandbox. You try to evolve your Roman house to higher levels by providing services and food. Its mainly juggling resources and production so your warehouse don't get full, because it will start a chain reaction of your houses devolving. Specially crazy when you have a really big city.
My only complaint is that when I built my city of several hundred buildings, with even lower class section to middle class housing sections, working to towards building the upper class section. So I save and came back to it then WTF!!!! Most of my city is gone just roads and few building are left, there must be some GLITCH!!!! Or BUG!!! My city got nuked or did the barbarians raid it WTF!!! I was bummed. But I still had fun playing though. I hope the developers fix this. Total crap with this bug, but I still recommend it because it was fun to play.
First of all one of the main reasons why I bought this game is because Im a really big fan of the Caesar series. This is not as awesome as the third or fourth one of those in particular but nonetheless. Its still worth buying for the low price if you really love that memorabilia as opposed to this one being Ancient Rome and its second instalment and that being with an exception thats if that is the case if but apart from that its accurately speaking probably not worth the amount of 8 dollars unless of course the price has been reduced over time in which case it should be ok. Far out stuff totally.
always the same....boring
Decent building and economic game, more on the casual side.
This game is ok in the sense that it has 30 single player missions where you go on to build more and more complex cities and satisfying more and more tiers of needs like the classics such as Caesar, Zeus and Emperor: Rise of the Middle Kingdom have taught us. There are walkers here and fortunately the game stays on the casual side of you needing just to make money to be able to build more buildings as the fundamental progression mechanism.
Tip: The best way to play this game unlike the classics is to have large poor districts that contribute to your economy without using many of the resources and a few houses (a little rich district) for the mission objectives. This is because every house needs more and more resources when it develops and you end up having something like one house needing one farm/production building if you really upgrade them far enough.
For a deeper economic game but modern and easy to get into, I recommend Imperium Romanum and Grand Ages: Rome.
Dear developers, all the premises are here for a good economic game. I hope I can see a more complex game on Steam from you in the future.
This feels like a browser game that I paid $2 for and ran on a $2000 PC. Incredibly dull game, if I can call it that at all. Place, plop, grow basics but even that felt broken to some extent. I lost all interest after just a short while, it had no challenge to it whatsoever. Mabye back in the 1990's it would have been great, but this thing isn't even suited for any gameplay. Save your $2
Meh.
You have to do every city on the Italian peninsula and then I just don't know I got bored real quick. Buy the re-release of Sierra Caesars and enjoy them instead.
The dev makes you do mundane tasks as if Steam players have never played a sim before. Graphics are good for 1999. Overall I give it a 7/10 for boring and 3/10 for enjoyment.
Did I mention Meh?
Not bad for a fiver. Basically a slimmed-down Caesar 3, with the population mangement taken out. Seems to have around 3-4 hours of content in the campaign, but there's a sandbox mode if you just want to sit building cities.
You build houses and then provide goods and amenities to upgrade those houses, producing more tax income and so allowing you to build more stuff. There's an economic chain of production with a dozen or more goods - about as complex as you'd get from a Settlers game, really. Goods can be made for export, or used to support your population's gradual evolution from bottom-tier slave workers to high-end villa dwellers.
One EXTREMELY annoying feature is the fires, which are dealt with by spam-clocking on the burning buildings. Whoever thought this would make a cool feature needs to go and seriously think about their lifestyle choices, because it's just annoying; I get the idea of fires to force you to build a fire brigade, but for God's sake just let them automatically tackle fires rather than introducing this mobile-friendly tap-sim.
All in all, it's pretty good for the price, but since you can probably get Caesar 3 or 4 for a couple of quid more, you're likely better off going for those.
Дополнительная информация
| Разработчик | Ladia Group |
| Платформы | Windows, Mac |
| Ограничение возраста | Нет |
| Дата релиза | 01.02.2025 |
| Отзывы пользователей | 63% положительных (8) |