Zooicide

Love It.

UPDATE

[quote]Warning: Dead PVP Game
This game has no meaningful single player content, and no playable PvP servers. There is no functioning PvP population, it's a dead game, and cannot be played as intended.[/quote]I'm not really sure if Zooicide is an asset flip. Some elements of this game certainly make it seem like the developer put some effort into assembling some kind of original here. On the other hand, a lot of the game assets don't seem like they were created by the developer, but they haven't credited any asset creators for supplying assets, which might be a case of plagiarism. There's no evidence, so we need to give the benefit of the doubt... regardless, asset flip or not, the quality here is indistinguishable from many asset flip/cash grab scams, and that's a problem in itself.

Zooicide is an older game from 2017. It's a venerable 8 years old at the time of this review. It's a completely dead PvP arena combat game with no players. The idea (which I am sure nobody is surprised didn't catch on) is that a variety of zoo animals are pitted against each other or humans in a zoo themed arena. Yeah... nobody asked for this.

The game was abandoned roughly 7 months after launch and hasn't been updated in 7 and a half years. It blew past the developers commitment to complete the game without any notification or admission of failure from the developer. The game will never be completed.

On the upside, the game does feature customisable controls and resolution, so at least some of the basic, minimum requirements have been met. Unfortunately there's a number of other technical defects and shortcomings which contribute to the game being difficult to recommend to gamers.

The game features lazy low-polygon "retro" assets, making this look like a barely functional 3D game from the 1990s. It's unclear why the developers weren't able to arrange high quality, high polygon count contemporary assets for the game, and also irrelevant... what matters is that this looks bad as a result of their decisions, a compromise PC gamers shouldn't have to put up with.

The developers made the fatal, lazy mistake of believing that PvP, other players, would be an acceptable substitute for doing the difficult job of adding single player level design, storytelling, NPCs and other rich aspects of designed game content to the game. As a result of this choice by the developers, the game has little to no actual interactive game content. It's a little considered fact that the vast majority of PvP only, multiplayer only games fail. Developers must learn that other players are not an acceptable substitute for doing the job of game developers and building a game filled with content. PvP only games must have a huge player base for them to "go viral" and succeed. But with no single player experience to add lasting value to a game, the developers instead chose to bet against all odds that their game would "go viral" without any actual reason for players to want to play the game. Predictably, they lost this bet.

Compounding this problem, the developers made the terrible mistake of launching a multiplayer only game in Early Access. This is almost certain to kill the game. Most gamers will evaluate a game only once. If they do so when the game is incomplete, they will check it out, then abandon it (just like the developers did). When (IF) the game eventually does get around to release, there will be no players, because the developers burned the first impressions through their faulty Early Access experience. Players who saw the game and didn't like it because it was incomplete do not come back. Multiplayer games must have a large population if they are to go "viral" and succeed, especially without single player content to fall back on. Releasing a multiplayer only game into early access kills the game population, and thus the game, before the game even launches.

These technical defects push this game below acceptable standards for any modern PC game.

Unethically, the developers have left this on the Steam store in a dead, abandoned and unplayable state (because there's no players and no meaningful single player content). It's the responsibility of the developer to maintain their product, ensure it runs on all modern PCs, or if they determine there's defects and the game doesn't work, or the population dies, they should remove it from sale instead of misleadingly trying to scam gamers into buying knowingly dead/unplayable products.

This is harmful to Steam and to gamers, not just because it's a direct and intentional attempt to scam people, but because it takes a share of the marketing space and visibility away from other games. It's polluting Steam and making it harder for gamers to find genuine games and for genuine indie developers who put months or years into making proper games find an audience.

Another unethical act of this developer, knowing full well that this game is abandoned and they will never complete it, they are deliberately trying to scam gamers into buying it by offering it on discount and selling keys to the game from third party key resellers. It's impossible to "accidentally" discount a game. The developer looked at their abandoned game, and instead of doing the right thing and removing it from Steam, they instead doubled-down and tried to scam even more people into paying for it. Greedy, and completely unethical. Doing the wrong thing, on purpose, for money. This is not okay.

Furthering the unethical nature of this developer, while they are selling this incomplete game under Valve's failed Early Access program, they're abusing that program, and not working on this game full time, as they have other projects in the works. That means there's ZERO confidence anyone who buys this in Early Access will receive a complete game, and it's possible that they're being scammed.

So, should you buy this game? Is this one of the best of the 110,000+ games on Steam?

The developer is deliberately and unethically trying to scam gamers into paying them the farcical price of $5 USD for a game they know is abandoned, dead and unplayable. Don't give it to them.

For comparison, the $5 asking price for this game could get you games like "Rainbow 6 Siege", "Middle Earth - Shadow of Mordor" or "Company of Heroes". Quality, professionally made games like those are frequently on sale cheaper than this.

this game is dead

smash

BEST GAME EVER

Is funny but is dead but at least there’s bots

nice game

Its a cool concept of a game similar to gang beasts in my opinion its chill and even tho looks kind of silly its supposed to be that way especially playing with friends its funnier and makes the game feel more fun in general. But this game has no one playing it because it doesnt get updated, all it needs is maybe another map or 2 to chose from, and obviously new animals like zebra or snake or even seal lmao just make the game have more. Also, could use another gamemode, dont know if I can think of a good one right now but if there are other maps added then they could look different like every map is a different terrain or whatever the word is like lions and zebras are in one map and its based off where they live and another map maybe mostly water and they add dolphins and seals and sharks even the polar bear and it would be a map you only chose from those types and one more example a rocky enclosure for like grizzly bear and eagle and they could add mountain goat or tiger or anything but adding something to the game if its possible could definately have people return and this game get a chance. overall its pretty worth it if u have humor and friends :) - even alone is fun theres bots :))))